Sunday, September 8, 2013

THE ASSAM TRIBUNE<>
Guwahati, Sunday, March 01, 2009


News
• City
• State
• Sports
• Business
• Obituary

Opinion
• Editorial
• Photos

Features
• Panorama
• Mosaic
• Horizon

BUSINESS

Will India’s bailout package ease global finance crisis?
By Devajit Mahanta
 Before we digest the process of “bailout”, we must first of all explore its meaning. In economics, a bailout is an act of loaning or giving capital to a failing business in order to save it from bankruptcy, insolvency or total liquidation and ruin. It is like when some one is heavily under debt and someone pays for him so that he can start afresh.

According to Bloomberg and Congressional Research Services (CRS), the US Federal Government has made commitments worth a total of $8.5 trillion (about Rs 42,50,000 crore) in the bailouts of 2008 which exceeds the combined cost of every major war the United States has ever engaged in.

Back home in India, the closure decision of Tata’s Jamshedpur plant, decision of Ashok Leyland to run only for three days a week for the coming two months, decreasing interest rate, lowered REPO rate and reverse gear of stock market compelled the Indian government to finally came out with an economic bailout package of Rs 2,75,000 crore in December ’08 to restore stability and growth to our nation’s financial crisis. This bailout seems similar in nature as the Wall Street bailout practiced in America. If the US’ $8.5 trillion package has failed to boost the US economy, can we expect a similar measure to prove fruitful for India? that is the pertinent question. The stock market in India fell so steep that in some cases the fall was about 10%. Had the bailout been a good one the markets would have made a smart recovery. Fact is market is suffering from deficiency in demand therefore deficiency in demand should be treated to save both the economy and the investors.

A certain section of the Indian government pushed for a Rs 200-crore package for scam-hit Satyam in the form of debt but it was turned down by the Prime Minister and thereby made an unwritten rule that government would not bail out a private company with the sole exception of banks. The government justifies its interventions in the case of banks as the RBI, which has ensured adherence to procedure, regulates it. A private company competing in the market can’t be treated on the same plank as banks.

The trillion-dollar question emerging today is whether the bailout packages by the Government will ease global finance crisis and what will happen to the shareholders. Many of the companies and institutions which are suffering due to the ailing economy are large, which means there is a major need for management talent to run them. But why should the managements that got these institutions into the positions they now are in be expected to get them straightened out and healthy again? Also the shareholders have no right to ask their money back because there is no equity left in these institutions. Every shareholders’ and investors’ dream is to buy stocks and watch the value of the investment grow. But what is clear is that when one chooses to invest, there is the likelihood that he could lose some or all of his money. This is the stark reality facing most investors and stockbrokers in India today as the market capitalism tumbled down since after November 2008.

Three things need to happen in order to resolve the crisis. First, banks must figure the true value of assets. Second, they must raise more capital and third, home loans need to be restructured. The government’s bailout plan addresses the first point by establishing a price for hard-to-value assets.

Overall in the world economic scenario, the year 2009 is starting in an unprecedented way. US and Japan, among the largest economies in the world, started the year with zero interest rates. China has opted for a $586 billion bailout programme, the largest fiscal package in recorded history. In India, the Reserve Bank of India slashed basis points while the Sixth Pay Commission implementation has greased the system a bit. The “Credit market crisis of 2008” is worse than America’s great depression in the 1930s because the size of derivatives transactions between counter parties was magnificently large.

Readers can send their feedback at devajitmahanta@gmail.com


No comments: