Sunday, September 8, 2013

THE ASSAM TRIBUNE<>
Guwahati, Friday, July 25, 2008


News
• City
• State
• Sports
• Business
• Obituary

Opinion
• Editorial
• Letters
• Photos

Features

BUSINESS

Possibility of integrating commodity market with share market
By Devajit Mahanta
 International experience shows that markets are converging not only across products but also across geographies. Since 2002 when the first national level commodity derivatives exchange started, the exchanges have conducted brisk business in commodities futures trading. The value of trading after saw a quantum jump from about INR 350 billion in 2001-02 to INR 1.3 trillion in 2003-04, the commodity derivatives exchanges now demanded removal of restrictions on participation of other financial system players, particularly stock-brokers in commodity derivative. Following their demand Ramamoorthy Committee was set up by Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to look into certain issues relating to fruitful cooperation between these two markets. The committee was specifically asked to examine the possibilities of: first securities brokers’ participation in the commodities markets; second, utilization of infrastructural facilities of stock exchanges by commodity exchanges; and third, the possibility of stock exchanges trading in commodity derivatives.

Any rationale for convergence should hinge upon its capacity to ensure growth, liquidity and safety of the market as well as to improve accessibility to the public by spreading the network and reducing the transaction costs. The existing infrastructure and institutions are being upgraded; new exchanges have been approved with the mandate to set up world-class infrastructure and systems; more participants with resources, skills and expertise are being attracted from the securities markets. Even though there are some differences in commodity and financial derivatives markets, they have close resemblance in so far as trade practices and mechanism are concerned. At present there are two separate Acts viz. FCI Act 1952 and SCI Act, 1956 with Rules made there under governing the two markets. Even though there are many similarities in the text of these Acts, they will need to be harmonized so that, as far as possible, a common regulatory environment can be provided for the exchanges and participants.

It would be necessary to explore if there are different approaches to convergence so that it can be ensured that while the process of development is accelerated further, the changes are not abrupt resulting in avoidable disruption. The path of convergence has to address the apprehensions, concerns of the existing stakeholders and Exchanges. The gains from convergence have to outweigh the potential loss. Different approaches to convergence can be thought of on the basis of extent or level of convergence. Convergence at the level of brokerage firms- the stock brokers have to distinct entities, one for trading in securities and the other in commodities, each meeting the admission criteria independently. Convergence at the Level of Policy Making- Under this Option, Department of Consumer Affairs and Department of Economic Affairs would set up a committee through which there could be closer coordination on policy issues connected with Exchanges, product launches, membership, international participation, etc. Convergence at the level of Regulators- the regulators, FMC and SEBI, would embark upon a programme of closer coordination of their activities. This option is clearly a step forward when compared with the existing regime, where there is no institutional mechanism through which the regulatory work on commodity derivatives interacts with the regulatory work on financial derivatives.

International experience shows that markets are converging not only across products but also across geographies. The considerations, competition and economies of scale made possible by new technology are forcing markets to converge. It is only the markets with strong niche or regulatory protection that are able to retain a separate entity. Once regulatory barriers are withdrawn, the competition will take away the business to more efficient exchanges forcing merger and or the demise of less efficient exchanges.

Readers can send their feedback at devajitmahanta@gmail.com


No comments: